Technologies and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures throughout Europe, new technologies have become reviving these kinds of systems. From lie detection tools analyzed at the border to a system for verifying documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of systems is being used by asylum applications. This article explores just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their particular capacity to find their way these systems and to go after their legal right for safeguards.

It also illustrates how these kinds of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering them from opening the channels of protection. It how to pace yourself in online learning further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of those technologies, through which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects who also are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article states that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: when they assist with expedite the asylum process, they also produce it difficult meant for refugees to navigate these systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions made by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.

Leave a Reply